Shubi AI - Privacy-Preserving Offline Forensic Analysis | AI Marketing Flow

πŸ›‘οΈ Shubi Offline Forensic AI

AI-Powered Security Analysis That Learns & Forgets

Offline security log analyzer powered by ERLA (Ephemeral Recursive Learning Agents). Continuous improvement with zero data retention. Your logs stay on your machineβ€”only abstract patterns survive.

99.4%
Pass Rate (344 Tests)
89.6
Avg Quality Score
0
Data Retained
18
OSINT Test Cases

⚠️ The Problem: Learning vs Privacy

Modern AI systems face a fundamental tension: to improve, they must learn from data; but to preserve privacy, they must not retain data. This creates an impossible constraint for security tools handling sensitive logs, PII, and confidential information.

βœ… Our Solution: Agents That Learn & Die

Shubi spawns ephemeral agents for each analysis task. They process your logs, extract abstract security patterns, then self-destructβ€”leaving only generalized knowledge that improves future detection. Your specific data is never stored.

Diagram showing how Shubi AI processes security data while retaining zero original information

⚑ ERLA Architecture

Ephemeral Recursive Learning Agents: The engine behind Shubi's privacy-preserving intelligence.

Agent Lifecycle (Each Task)

β‘  SPAWN β†’ β‘‘ ANALYZE β†’ β‘’ LEARN β†’ β‘£ DISTILL β†’ β‘€ DESTROY

Spawn: Agent created with task context β†’ Analyze: Process logs via two-speed system β†’ Learn: Extract abstract patterns β†’ Distill: Push to knowledge base β†’ Destroy: Purge all specific data

Technical illustration of Shubi's fast path and slow path threat analysis architecture

πŸ”‘ Key Features

Enterprise-grade security analysis that runs entirely on your machine.

🧠

Two-Speed Response

Fast path (~10ms) for known patterns, slow path for novel threats. Gets faster as it learns.

πŸ”’

Zero Data Retention

Sensitive data exists only during analysis. Cryptographic erasure after each task.

πŸ“‘

100% Offline

No cloud APIs, no data exfiltration. Works in air-gapped environments.

🎯

65K+ Threat Indicators

Malicious domains, IPs, detection rules, and behavioral signatures built-in.

πŸ“ˆ

Recursive Improvement

Every analysis makes the system smarter. No manual retraining required.

πŸ›‘οΈ

Multi-Category Detection

C2, credential theft, persistence, exfiltration, stalkerware, and more.

πŸ“Š How Shubi Compares

ERLA fills a gap that existing approaches cannot address.

ApproachContinuous LearningPrivacy PreservingOffline Capable
RAG Systemsβœ—βœ—Partial
LangChain / Orchestrationβœ—βœ—βœ—
Lifelong Learning LLMsβœ“βœ—βœ—
Federated Learningβœ“βœ“βœ—
Shubi (ERLA)βœ“βœ“βœ“

πŸ“ˆ Test Results (Feb 2026)

Validated against 344 test scenarios across 7 device types and 14 attack categories.

100%
C2 Beacon Detection
100%
Credential Theft
100%
Stalkerware (94.3 score)
100%
Data Exfiltration
95.6%
macOS Coverage
92.5%
Windows Coverage
83%
Android Coverage
80.7%
iPhone Coverage

🎯 Attack Categories Tested

14 attack types validated across 344 test scenarios with real-world threat patterns.

94.5
C2 Beacon (29 tests)
94.3
Stalkerware (30 tests)
94.1
Data Exfiltration (29 tests)
92.4
Credential Theft (33 tests)
91.7
SQL Injection (26 tests)
91.0
Windows Malware (29 tests)
90.7
IMSI Catcher (28 tests)
90.0
Spyware (26 tests)
94.6
Emergency Response (26 tests)
91.6
Network Segmentation (31 tests)
90.9
Account Security (29 tests)
90.3
Suspicious IP (29 tests)

πŸ”¬ OSINT-Based Validation

18 real-world threat scenarios from trusted intelligence sources. 100% coverage rate.

Visualization of 18 real-world threat intelligence sources used to validate Shubi AI
🦠

Emotet Malware Dropper

CISA Alert AA20-280A β€’ 19 recommendations β€’ Windows malware with credential theft

πŸ“±

Pegasus Zero-Click Exploit

Citizen Lab β€’ 4 recommendations β€’ iPhone stalkerware/spyware detection

πŸ€–

Mirai Botnet Scanning

Shadowserver Foundation β€’ 10 recommendations β€’ IoT port scanning detection

πŸ“§

Business Email Compromise

FBI IC3 Report β€’ 8 recommendations β€’ Account security patterns

⛏️

Cryptominer Hijacking

Unit 42 Cloud Report β€’ 9 recommendations β€’ Server compromise detection

πŸ“

AirTag Stalking

Apple Safety Alerts β€’ 4 recommendations β€’ Physical tracking detection

πŸͺ΅

Log4Shell Exploitation

CISA Alert β€’ 3 recommendations β€’ Injection pattern detection

πŸ“²

SIM Swap Attack

Krebs on Security β€’ 8 recommendations β€’ Account takeover prevention

πŸ“™ Edge Cases Also Tested

10 additional "might struggle" scenarios validated: Deepfake Vishing (WSJ), Supply Chain NPM Attack (Snyk), Bluetooth Tracking (EFF), Adversarial ML (MITRE ATLAS), Starlink Interception (Citizen Lab), QR Code Phishing (FBI), USB Rubber Ducky (Hak5), Juice Jacking (FBI Denver), Smart Car Hacking (DEF CON), AI Chatbot Data Leak (Samsung incident).

βœ… Compliance by Design

Privacy isn't a featureβ€”it's the architecture.

πŸ‡ͺπŸ‡Ί
GDPR Ready
Right to erasure by default
πŸ₯
HIPAA Compatible
PHI never persists
πŸ”
SOC 2 Aligned
Abstract audit trails only
πŸ›‘οΈ
Air-Gap Ready
Zero network dependency

🎯 Use Cases

Built for security professionals who can't compromise on privacy.

πŸ” Incident Response

Analyze breach logs without creating additional data exposure. Patterns learned, specifics forgotten.

πŸ“± Mobile Forensics

Detect stalkerware and mobile threats with 600+ behavioral signatures. No cloud upload required.

🏒 Enterprise SOC

On-premises log analysis that improves over time without accumulating sensitive data.

πŸ›οΈ Government / Military

Air-gapped security analysis for classified environments. Zero external dependencies.

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about ERLA and Shubi.

Isn't this just fine-tuning with extra steps?

LoRA is a technique; ERLA is an architecture. The innovation is the ephemeral agent lifecycle combined with knowledge abstraction. Fine-tuning alone doesn't address privacy, continuous learning, or recursive improvement.

Why not just use RAG?

RAG excels for frequently changing data. Training is better for stable domain expertise. RAG stores data in vector databases; ERLA abstracts knowledge and destroys dataβ€”critical for privacy-sensitive applications.

How does this compare to LangChain?

LangChain orchestrates LLMs with tools and APIs. ERLA creates your own model. They're complementaryβ€”you could use LangChain with an ERLA-trained model.

Isn't offline AI a niche use case?

GDPR, HIPAA, SOC2 often require on-premises data. Air-gapped environments can't use cloud APIs. Edge AI spending is projected to grow 20%+ annually through 2028.

Can small models match GPT-4 quality?

For narrow domains, yes. A 7B model trained on your data often outperforms GPT-4 on your specific tasks. The trade-off is generality for specialization.

What are the genuine limitations?

Not suitable for rapidly changing data (use RAG). Requires technical setup. 8GB RAM minimum, 16GB+ recommended. Training requires some ML knowledge.

πŸš€ Get Started with Shubi

Download the ERLA whitepaper for the full technical deep-dive, or explore our case studies to see Shubi in action.

DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18422395 | License: CC BY 4.0